+7 499 346 3588
RUEN
Get in touch
See what IT is actually doing: people, tasks, code and services in one picture

IT control: what engineering does and what it costs

IT work is usually smeared across five systems: an issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, chat and a project office. Merging them by hand is impossible, so managers judge by feel. We build one registry of people and one event feed across all systems, then show the dashboards: who worked on what, where it stalled, what it cost and what actually shipped. Plus a passport for every service — what it does, where it runs, whether it is alive and what it talks to.

Discuss your case What is included
01Who it is for
  • IT directors and heads of engineering running more than one team
  • Companies where both staff and contractors build software
  • Owners who pay for IT and want to see what for
02What it replaces
  • Hand-built Monday spreadsheets
  • Verbal status-meeting reports
  • Disconnected exports from five systems
IT under control
03Components

What is included

IT control

People, tasks, code and time in one picture
in production

Merges into one picture what is scattered across five disconnected systems: the issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, assistant requests and the project office. One registry of people, one event feed and dashboards on top.

The job

Give the manager a factual picture of IT work instead of feelings and verbal reports.

What hurt

  • Work data is spread across systems and never reconciled
  • The same person is registered differently in every system
  • Assessment rests on impressions rather than facts

What you get

  • One person, one profile, every account linked
  • You can see where work stalled and what it cost
  • The management report assembles itself

What your client gets

  • A development customer sees progress, not just the result at the end
last change: 29 Sep 2026

Service passports

What runs where and how it is wired
in production

Builds a passport for every service: what it does, where it runs, whether it is alive, what it talks to and who owns it. Passports rebuild themselves whenever something changes on the servers, so the question 'what do we even have' stops depending on an admin's memory.

last change: 30 Sep 2026

Development pipeline

From a task to a ready change
in development

From task to change: a task enters the tracker, AI triages it and assigns a project, an agent makes the change in its own branch and opens a merge request, and a person accepts the result. Progress shows on the task card.

The job

Shorten the path from a stated task to a verified change and take the mechanical part off people.

What hurt

  • A small change waits in a queue for weeks
  • Identical changes are redone from scratch, differently each time

What you get

  • An agent prepares the change and the merge request; a person only accepts the result
  • The checks are the same for every change
  • A failed review sends the work back to the machine, not to a person

What your client gets

  • A client-specific change takes days rather than a quarter
last change: 30 Sep 2026

Nightly code review

AI checks yesterday's changes
pilot

Every night AI reviews the changes that reached production services over the past day, looking for bugs and data corruption. Two independent agents then try to refute each finding against the code; in the morning the author gets only what both of them confirmed.

last change: 30 Sep 2026
04Implementation

How it works for you

Connect the sources

Issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, project office — read-only, nothing is modified.

Merge the people

One employee, one profile, with every external account linked.

Build the feed

Issues, code changes, work intervals and assistant requests in one table.

Show the dashboards

Who worked on what, where it stalled, what it cost and what actually shipped.

05Comparison

Three ways to solve this

We are not the only option, and we show plainly where we lose.

Build it yourselfOff-the-shelf vendorBIOCARD Tech
Time to first resultQuarters: hiring, learning the domain, architecture from scratchWeeks to install — then months bending processes to fit the boxA demo immediately, a pilot in weeks: the product already exists
Domain contextYou will have to teach the team what a batch and a temperature mode areA generic product with no notion of a shipment or a cold chainWe work in it daily — the context is included
Who carries the riskYou do: for the timeline and for the solution turning out wrongYou do: changes outside the vendor roadmap usually never happenWe do: the product runs in our own company and we use it ourselves
Changes for youAnything is possible — if the team stays and is not pulled elsewhereOn the vendor's roadmap and prioritiesDays rather than quarters: our own delivery pipeline
Where we loseFull control over the code and priorities stays with youA large partner ecosystem, training and certificationWe are a small team and we do not take every job
06Cost

Price on request

There is no price list, and that is not a trick: almost every product needs configuration for your processes and integrations, so the same system costs differently at two companies. We quote after the demo, when the scope is visible — not before it.

01

What you get

A working product rather than from-scratch development. The core already exists and runs in our own company, so you pay for the rollout and the fit-out, not for inventing the solution.

02

What the quote is made of

The amount of fit-out for your processes, the number and complexity of integrations, and the requirements around data and timing. All of it becomes visible after a demo on your own data.

03

When we name a figure

After the demo and a short review of your case. The quote is fixed — not time-and-materials.

Where the work stops

The service only reads its sources and never drives them: it does not close issues, edit code or adjust time records. It is a window onto the facts; decisions stay with the manager.

07FAQ

Questions about this solution

Is this employee surveillance?

No. The dashboards are built from work artefacts — issues, code changes, deliveries — not from screen activity. Change descriptions and chat are not shown: they contain personal details that do not belong in a report.

We use a different issue tracker. Will it fit?

Yes. Sources connect through adapters; we already read several different systems at once, because we run several ourselves.

How long does connecting take?

The first dashboards take weeks: the hard part is not the code but agreeing read access.

08More solutions

Related solutions

See it on your data

Forty minutes, a working product, no slides. Then a pilot in your environment.

Discuss your case +7 499 346 3588

All solutions →

Discuss your case