See what IT is actually doing: people, tasks, code and services in one picture

IT under control

IT work is usually smeared across five systems: an issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, chat and a project office. Merging them by hand is impossible, so managers judge by feel. We build one registry of people and one event feed across all systems, then show the dashboards: who worked on what, where it stalled, what it cost and what actually shipped. Plus a passport for every service — what it does, where it runs, whether it is alive and what it talks to.

Discuss your case What is included

01Who it is for

IT directors and heads of engineering running more than one team
Companies where both staff and contractors build software
Owners who pay for IT and want to see what for

02What it replaces

Hand-built Monday spreadsheets
Verbal status-meeting reports
Disconnected exports from five systems

03What is included

What is included

IT control

People, tasks, code and time in one picture

in production

Merges into one picture what is scattered across five disconnected systems: the issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, assistant requests and the project office. One registry of people, one event feed and dashboards on top.

The job

Give the manager a factual picture of IT work instead of feelings and verbal reports.

What hurt

Work data is spread across systems and never reconciled
The same person is registered differently in every system
Assessment rests on impressions rather than facts

What you get

One person, one profile, every account linked
You can see where work stalled and what it cost
The management report assembles itself

What your client gets

A development customer sees progress, not just the result at the end

last change: 04 Sep 2026

Service passports

What runs where and how it is wired

pilot

Builds a passport for every service: what it does, where it runs, whether it is alive, what it talks to and who owns it. The question 'what do we even have' stops depending on an admin's memory.

last change: 02 Sep 2026

Sprint planner

Planning on top of repositories

in development

A task and sprint board on top of the repository system: planning, estimation, decomposition and delivery visibility — while the repositories remain the single source of truth.

last change: 03 Jul 2026

04How it works for you

How it works for you

Connect the sources

Issue tracker, repositories, time tracking, project office — read-only, nothing is modified.

Merge the people

One employee, one profile, with every external account linked.

Build the feed

Issues, code changes, work intervals and assistant requests in one table.

Show the dashboards

Who worked on what, where it stalled, what it cost and what actually shipped.

05Comparison

Three ways to solve this

We are not the only option, and we show plainly where we lose.

	Build it yourself	Off-the-shelf vendor	BIOCARD Tech
Time to first result	Quarters: hiring, learning the domain, architecture from scratch	Weeks to install — then months bending processes to fit the box	A demo immediately, a pilot in weeks: the product already exists
Domain context	You will have to teach the team what a batch and a temperature mode are	A generic product with no notion of a shipment or a cold chain	We work in it daily — the context is included
Who carries the risk	You do: for the timeline and for the solution turning out wrong	You do: changes outside the vendor roadmap usually never happen	We do: the product runs in our own company and we use it ourselves
Changes for you	Anything is possible — if the team stays and is not pulled elsewhere	On the vendor's roadmap and priorities	Days rather than quarters: our own delivery pipeline
Where we lose	Full control over the code and priorities stays with you	A large partner ecosystem, training and certification	We are a small team and we do not take every job

06Cost

Price on request

There is no price list, and that is not a trick: almost every product needs configuration for your processes and integrations, so the same system costs differently at two companies. We quote after the demo, when the scope is visible — not before it.

What you get

A working product rather than from-scratch development. The core already exists and runs in our own company, so you pay for the rollout and the fit-out, not for inventing the solution.

What the quote is made of

The amount of fit-out for your processes, the number and complexity of integrations, and the requirements around data and timing. All of it becomes visible after a demo on your own data.

When we name a figure

After the demo and a short review of your case. The quote is fixed — not time-and-materials.

Where the work stops

The service only reads its sources and never drives them: it does not close issues, edit code or adjust time records. It is a窗 of facts; decisions stay with the manager.

07FAQ

Questions about this solution

Is this employee surveillance?

No. The dashboards are built from work artefacts — issues, code changes, deliveries — not from screen activity. Change descriptions and chat are not shown: they contain personal details that do not belong in a report.

We use a different issue tracker. Will it fit?

Yes. Sources connect through adapters; we already read several different systems at once, because we run several ourselves.

How long does connecting take?

The first dashboards take weeks: the hard part is not the code but agreeing read access.

See it on your data

Forty minutes, a working product, no slides. Then a pilot in your environment.

Discuss your case +7 499 346 3588

All solutions →